From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: jtc@redback.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Remove unused header files.
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 15:06:00 -0000
Message-id: <3AA56CCA.E2095BCF@cygnus.com>
References: <5mitltndwn.fsf@jtc.redback.com> <3AA2C971.D2432CEA@cygnus.com> <5mvgpm4mgx.fsf@jtc.redback.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg00127.html

"J.T. Conklin" wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:
> >> The decode_line_1() declaration (IMO) indicates a unclear separation
> >> of interface and implementation.  (Again, IMO) a function declaration
> >> should only be in one header.  Please share your thoughts, on this
> >> specific case, and in general.  decode_line_1() is the first of many
> >> functions that have multiple declarations.
> 
> Andrew> Only one? Just don't get me started on the number of extern
> Andrew> declarations that appear in .c files! :-) Yes, I agree that
> Andrew> function declarations should only appear once.
> 
> Is this one of the things your static analysis database is checks for
> (And can you send me a pointer to it again)?

Static analysis database? You mean that big nasty (probably broken) awk
script?

http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/ari/

It checks it but doesn't list it (well not by default).

	Andrew