From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] solib-svr4 cleanups
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 15:01:00 -0000
Message-id: <3AA4E937.50C25898@cygnus.com>
References: <1010302200140.ZM22868@ocotillo.lan> <3AA2794F.9ADC0E92@cygnus.com> <1010306002007.ZM8108@ocotillo.lan>
X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg00126.html

> BTW, I would be more inclined to use solib-lm-tbd.c or perhaps
> solib-lm-legacy.c.  (The only problem that I have with "tbd" is that
> it often means "to be determined" - or at least that's what I first
> thought of when I saw it.) Anyway, one of these names would cause this
> file to remain grouped with the other solib-* files.  The use of
> either "tbd" or "legacy" in the name still enables all of the legacy
> file to be found via ``ls *tbd*''.

Doesn't worry me.  Even solib-legacy.c

	Andrew