From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cagney To: Will Cohen Cc: jtc@redback.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Patch to provide m68k simulator to gdb Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:17:00 -0000 Message-id: <3A9D31FC.F09D0DAA@cygnus.com> References: <3A9C3128.A52307A@redhat.com> <5my9uru2c4.fsf@jtc.redback.com> <3A9D206A.D08A91A0@cygnus.com> <3A9D2E2C.7F87D4A2@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00517.html > How do we go about and get the pieces of paper to prove that > distribution of that file is approved? I don't think that files authored by the below will be a problem. May want to let them know of your plans though. > Here is some additional information on the copyrights. I have made a > list of the files in the m68k patch and identified the copyright > listed in each file. This is the list of UAE authors: > > Bernd Schmidt > Herman ten Brugge > Ed Hanway > Samuel Devulder The question is what has been contributed and then merged in by the above. Remember, if someone contributes a significant change to GDB (I view sim and gdb as separate entaties), I need to either seek out some sort of assignment or reject the code. I would at least check with the authors that they either have been getting some sort of approval for any submitted changes or have been avoiding major contributions from authors beyond the above. And remember, I'm not a lawyer :-) enjoy, Andrew