From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Snyder To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Daniel Berlin , Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] New C++ abstraction patch Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:19:00 -0000 Message-id: <3A944CEB.2EDE2369@cygnus.com> References: <200102210135.RAA21426@bosch.cygnus.com> <3A940B9C.696ACE7B@cygnus.com> <3A9431C0.6E23A2E6@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00434.html Andrew Cagney wrote: > > Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > I did this at first, but it seemed those only happened for certain > > headers (something to do with $(SRCDIR)), so I undid it before > > submitting the patch. > > I'll redo it. > > Yep. What is happening is that no one can be bothered converting the > entire file to that convention - automake will make the problem go away > right :-). Instead things just get incrementally tweaked when a new > file is added, broken include dependency gets noticed (or someone gets > board). Actually, I thought that the practice was only done selectively. I don't see its usefulness, except for headers that might have different names for different configurations.