From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, keiths@redhat.com, kevinb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Accomodate 64-bit msymbols in expressions
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 16:32:00 -0000
Message-id: <3A8DC6A0.E36D668@cygnus.com>
References: <3A8DBFEF.45B230C1@cygnus.com> <1010217003055.ZM12822@ocotillo.lan>
X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00319.html

Kevin Buettner wrote:
> 
> On Feb 16,  4:03pm, Michael Snyder wrote:
> 
> > The following change is motivated by the fact that the addresses of
> > minimal symbols currently get truncated to 32 bits in expressions.
> >
> > Does this look badly wrong to anybody?
> 
> Not badly wrong.  The only nit that I can pick is...
> 
> > !   /* Let's make the type big enough to hold a 64-bit address.  */
> > !   write_exp_elt_type (builtin_type_long_long);
> 
> ...that it might be preferable to use builtin_type_CORE_ADDR instead.
> 
> (I.e, think about what happens if TARGET_LONG_LONG_BIT == 32, but
> TARGET_ADDR_BIT == 64.)

That's a good idea.  Thanks.