From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, taylor@redhat.com, cagney@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] remote protocol support for harvard architecture
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:37:00 -0000
Message-id: <3A8C5A2A.7808464E@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00269.html

I'll check this in in a day or two.
2001-02-15  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@mvstp600e.cygnus.com>

	* remote.c (build_remote_gdbarch_data): Use new TARGET_ADDR_BIT 
	instead of TARGET_PTR_BIT (to support Harvard architectures).

Index: remote.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/remote.c,v
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -c -3 -p -r1.38 remote.c
*** remote.c	2001/02/08 06:03:53	1.38
--- remote.c	2001/02/15 22:35:26
*************** build_remote_gdbarch_data (void)
*** 5516,5522 ****
  
    /* Cisco stuff */
    tty_input = xmalloc (PBUFSIZ);
!   remote_address_size = TARGET_PTR_BIT;
  }
  
  void
--- 5516,5522 ----
  
    /* Cisco stuff */
    tty_input = xmalloc (PBUFSIZ);
!   remote_address_size = TARGET_ADDR_BIT;
  }
  
  void
>From msnyder@cygnus.com Thu Feb 15 14:44:00 2001
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: jimb@cygnus.com, ezannoni@cygnus.com
Subject: [RFA]: printing symbols with > 32 bit addrs.
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:44:00 -0000
Message-id: <3A8C5BDF.97924160@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00270.html
Content-length: 1423

 
Oddly enough, info functions seems to fail to print addresses of
non-debugging symbols when addresses are greater than 32 bits.
This patch seems a bit crude, so I'm wondering if anyone has
a better suggestion.
	
2001-02-15  Michael Snyder  <msnyder@mvstp600e.cygnus.com>

	* symtab.c (print_msymbol_info): Print addresses > 32 bits.

Index: symtab.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/symtab.c,v
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -c -3 -p -r1.28 symtab.c
*** symtab.c	2001/01/30 02:49:36	1.28
--- symtab.c	2001/02/15 22:41:21
*************** print_symbol_info (namespace_enum kind, 
*** 2652,2660 ****
  static void
  print_msymbol_info (struct minimal_symbol *msymbol)
  {
!   printf_filtered ("	%08lx  %s\n",
! 		   (unsigned long) SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol),
! 		   SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME (msymbol));
  }
  
  /* This is the guts of the commands "info functions", "info types", and
--- 2652,2665 ----
  static void
  print_msymbol_info (struct minimal_symbol *msymbol)
  {
!   if (TARGET_ADDR_BIT <= 32)
!     printf_filtered ("	%08lx  %s\n",
! 		     (unsigned long) SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol),
! 		     SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME (msymbol));
!   else
!     printf_filtered ("	%016llx  %s\n",
! 		     (LONGEST) SYMBOL_VALUE_ADDRESS (msymbol),
! 		     SYMBOL_SOURCE_NAME (msymbol));
  }
  
  /* This is the guts of the commands "info functions", "info types", and
>From taylor@cygnus.com Thu Feb 15 14:48:00 2001
From: David Taylor <taylor@cygnus.com>
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain@cygnus.com>
Cc: fnasser@cygnus.com, ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, keiths@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:48:00 -0000
Message-id: <200102152248.RAA12420@texas.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-02/msg00271.html
Content-length: 995

    From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain@cygnus.com>
    Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:30:03 -0800

    Hi Fernando,

    > And if he/she is a really good maintainer he/she will reject your patch
    > as it would be adding a restriction to inferior function calls that we
    > do not currently have.

    This is bothering me.

    I've seen some real "this is so embarrassing I should wear a brown
    paper bag over my head" bugs:

      (gdb) set input-radix 2
      Input radix now set to decimal 4294967295, hex ffffffff, octal 37777777777.

Umm, that bug only existed in the internal repository, not in the
sources.redhat.com one, only on big endian hosts, and it was due to
the failure to commit a header file change to the internal repository
when the rest of a bug fix was committed.

    Sorry if I make the author of that bug blush.   My point is that this
    happens in software, and that it's the job of the test suite to detect
    when it happens.

Absolutely!

    Michael