Re: [rfa/tui] Fix bitrot in tui/tui-file.c

[Syd Polk <spolk@cygnus.com>]

Sorry about my pre-emptive approval. I was mistaken as to who oversaw the tui
directory.



Jimmy Guo wrote:
> 
> Approved.
> 
> - Jimmy
> 
> On Thu, 25 May 2000, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> >Hello,
> >
> >When the TUI code was moved (by me :-/) out of gdb/utils.c into
> >gdb/tui/tui-file.c it was never compiled.  The attatched fixes that.
> >
> >Ok?
> >       Andrew
From guo@cup.hp.com Thu May 25 09:57:00 2000
From: Jimmy Guo <guo@cup.hp.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.cygnus.com>
Subject: Approved Re: [rfa/tui] Include <ncurses.h> when available.
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 09:57:00 -0000
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10005250955510.7033-100000@hpcll168.cup.hp.com>
References: <392D092C.9A73A086@cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2000-05/msg00394.html
Content-length: 690

Approved.  I will spend more time on cleaning up TUI support in the
coming weeks.  Thanks for the initiative!

- Jimmy

On Thu, 25 May 2000, Andrew Cagney wrote:

>Hello,
>
>The attatched twiddles gdb/tui so that it will include <ncurses.h> when
>available.  I've found <ncurses.h> to be more complete than <curses.h>
>on some systems.  The patch also eliminates a few stray <curses.h>
>includes.
>
>For those that are wondering, yes, this patch has the potential to clash
>with utils.c:#include<curses.h> ("tui.h" can be included by defs.h). 
>Since the TUI is still HP only that doesn't occure in the field.  Longer
>term I hope to see defs.h:#include<tui.h> replaced.
>
>	ok?
>		Andrew