From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32961 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2018 17:02:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32935 invoked by uid 89); 20 Aug 2018 17:02:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=announcement, submission, 71 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:02:32 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5556C0587FC for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from theo.uglyboxes.com (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCAEA2AAA0 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] C++ compile support To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20180810232534.481-1-keiths@redhat.com> <20180810232534.481-10-keiths@redhat.com> <83in4hmkpt.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3d4g6sz.fsf@gnu.org> From: Keith Seitz Message-ID: <3881f2bb-c466-9734-5851-f2cf91a4bc6a@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 17:02:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83y3d4g6sz.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-08/txt/msg00465.txt.bz2 On 08/17/2018 11:57 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I'm not sure how to answer this. That seems like enumerating all the dependencies >> of every dependency GDB has (bfd, libiberty, bison, etc). The feature (like the >> C compile feature already included) requires the compiler plug-in. Whatever that >> plug-in supports is what GDB supports. > > It is okay to say that this is supported only on platforms where > libcc1.so and the 'compile' command are available. My problem was > with not qualifying this at all. Gotcha. I've "copied" the announcement text from the original (C) compile submission talking about compiler requirement: This feature requires GCC 7.1 or higher built with libcp1.so (the C++ plug-in). >> Would you like me to include something like: "Currently tested on x86_64 >> GNU/Linux." > > Using "currently" is generally not advisable, as the meaning of that > word changes with time. Indeed! I've removed this text in favor of the above requirement statement. >> Would you like me to repost this patch? > > That won't be needed, thanks. Thank you for your comments/suggestions! Keith