From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22614 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2010 08:44:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 22601 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jan 2010 08:44:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:44:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE065CB0218; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:44:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MWcdDm-lHy9A; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:44:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C27CB016C; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:44:34 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [patch] Do not disappoint on "Create a core file of GDB?" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tristan Gingold In-Reply-To: <83fx6c8ncd.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:44:00 -0000 Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <36BBE15B-5F48-48CD-ABE6-E0D39818EBB2@adacore.com> References: <20100111160241.GA12356@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <83fx6c8ncd.fsf@gnu.org> To: Eli Zaretskii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2 On Jan 11, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Tristan Gingold >> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:07:30 +0100 >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org >>=20 >>=20 >>> setrlimit is a POSIX function so I hope it does not need autoconf magic: >>> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/setrlimit.html >>=20 >> Sure, but windows is not POSIX compliant, so I think you can't avoid som= e autoconf stuff. >=20 > Which "windows" do you have in mind? If it's Cygwin, I'd imagine it > does have setrlimit. If you are talking about native Windows, then it > cannot dump core, anyway, can it? Sure. But it doesn't have setrlimit/getrlimit.