Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch

paawan oza
2009-06-24T16:22:39Z

Gentle reminder for the reply for following mail.

--- On Mon, 6/15/09, paawan oza <paawan1982@yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: paawan oza <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: Submition of i386.record.floating.point.patch
> To: "Hui Zhu" <teawater@gmail.com>
> Cc: "Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Monday, June 15, 2009, 8:34 PM
> Hi Hui,
>
> I have already clarified the things.
>
> 1 -> all floating point registers (such as FTAG, FCTRL,
> FSTATUS) are required to record because of insn such as
> (FFREE)
> 2 -> gdb already has a support of all the FPU registers
> including FTAG, FSTATUS, FCTRL etc...
>
> more importantly, patch works and properly tested with with
> all possible scenerios.
> I am eagerly waiting for the patch's acceptance by gdb
> community : )
>
> please do the needful, If you have any specific sugestion
> please elaborate and I will definately improve upon it.
> please respond.
>
> Regards,
> Oza.
>
>
>
> > --- On Fri, 6/12/09, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> > > Subject: Re: Submition of
> > i386.record.floating.point.patch
> > > To: "paawan oza" <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
> > > Cc: "Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
> > gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> > > Date: Friday, June 12, 2009, 10:49 AM
> > > Even if you think i386 need this
> > > register, it should not be the part
> > > of process record patch.
> > > You can send a patch to make i386 support this
> > register
> > > first.
> > >
> > > Hui
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 22:59, paawan oza<paawan1982@yahoo.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > yes. I know.
> > > > I clarified that i386 also need FTAG,
> FSTATUS,
> > FCTRL,
> > > registers...
> > > > I am also waiting for the clarification
> from
> > Mark.
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Oza.
> > > >
> > > > --- On Thu, 6/11/09, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> > > >> Subject: Re: Submition of
> > > i386.record.floating.point.patch
> > > >> To: "paawan oza" <paawan1982@yahoo.com>
> > > >> Cc: "Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
> > > gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> > > >> Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 1:15 PM
> > > >> I had post my idea about your patch
> > > >> in before.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Hui
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 15:37, paawan
> > oza<paawan1982@yahoo.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Hi Hui,
> > > >> > Have you/any-body reviewed
> floating
> > point
> > > patch ?
> > > >> > I am waiting for the review
> comments,
> > and
> > > also the
> > > >> clarification from Mark.
> > > >> > please reply.
> > > >> > Regards,
> > > >> > Oza.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --- On Fri, 6/5/09, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> > > >> >> Subject: Re: Submition of
> > > >> i386.record.floating.point.patch
> > > >> >> To: "Mark Kettenis" <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> > > >> >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
> > > >> paawan1982@yahoo.com
> > > >> >> Date: Friday, June 5, 2009,
> 8:28 AM
> > > >> >> That is great.  Thanks Mark.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> Hui
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 10:56,
> Mark
> > > Kettenis<mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
> > > >> >> wrote:
> > > >> >> >> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009
> > 10:50:25
> > > +0800
> > > >> >> >> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> Could someone help us
> > about
> > > this?
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > I should be able to, but
> I'm
> > > currently
> > > >> travelling.
> > > >> >>  Should be back next week.
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>