From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-33895-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 9270 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2004 18:07:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 9260 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2004 18:07:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Jun 2004 18:07:44 -0000
Received: from zaretski ([80.230.152.243])
	by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR)
	with ESMTP id DEN60731;
	Wed, 16 Jun 2004 21:06:55 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 18:07:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@gnat.com>
Message-Id: <3405-Wed16Jun2004210332+0300-eliz@gnu.org>
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@false.org, jimb@redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20040616084237.F02D1F292A@nile.gnat.com> (message from Paul
	Hilfinger on Wed, 16 Jun 2004 04:42:37 -0400 (EDT))
Subject: Re: [RFA]: Turn on Ada support, take 2
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20040608090758.C59CAF2940@nile.gnat.com> <vt2aczd8aah.fsf@zenia.home> <20040609131240.GA7587@nevyn.them.org> <20040616084237.F02D1F292A@nile.gnat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00387.txt.bz2

> From: Paul Hilfinger <hilfingr@gnat.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 04:42:37 -0400 (EDT)
> 
>    [...] I will have to consider the
>    issue of formating things like 'Address, since the standard rendering
>    in info files provided by the technically appropriate marker, 
>    @code, looks rather bad (in my opinion), due to the adjacent quotes 
>    at the beginning.

If you feel strongly about this, I won't object to use of @t{'Address}
in those cases where you think the standard markup looks bad.

I have a couple more comments about the patch to gdb.texinfo; sorry
if I missed those in the first reading.

> +@node Ada Mode Intro
> +@subsubsection Introduction
> +@cindex Ada mode, general

There's no need to add the "general" qualifier here, since you have
no other index entry that begins with "Ada mode".  So simply say
"@cindex Ada mode".

> +While in Ada mode, you may use `@t{--}' for comments.

Is there a reason for using a @t here?  Why not @samp{--}?

Thanks.