From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2577 invoked by alias); 14 Aug 2002 10:55:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2483 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2002 10:55:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO balder.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.15) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Aug 2002 10:55:27 -0000 Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA) with ESMTP id BQW03428; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 13:54:37 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 03:55:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ac131313@ges.redhat.com Message-Id: <3405-Wed14Aug2002135202+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3D59A180.4090403@ges.redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:17:04 -0400) Subject: Re: [patch/rfa:doco] Reformat ``Remote Protocol'' appendix Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3D4D6494.30807@ges.redhat.com> <2950-Tue13Aug2002133142+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3D59A180.4090403@ges.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00343.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:17:04 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > > Finally, perhaps there should be an index entry for each > > packet/command. > > Yes. That is something to do next. Exactly how should it be done > though? Something like: > @cindex packet, e > @cindex e packet > et.al.. The latter is sufficient, I think. The important question when inventing index entries is "what phrase would one expect this item to be indexed with?"