From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: msnyder@cygnus.com Cc: jimb@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: don't try to compare IEEE NaN's Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 11:38:00 -0000 Message-id: <3405-Thu07Jun2001213423+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <3B1FBC02.2865152D@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00144.html > Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 10:38:10 -0700 > From: Michael Snyder > > > > That's because the bit pattern used by the original code was a bit > > pattern of a NaN in the first place. In other words, we've got > > exactly what we were asking for. You cannot expect that with a > > literal FP constant like the one you used. > > I was not specifically trying to create a NaN -- > just a recognizeable bit pattern. Yes, that's what I meant. Sorry if my wording implied something different.