From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18571 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2004 04:25:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18556 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2004 04:25:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 7 Jun 2004 04:25:41 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.146.105]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id DAL03073; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 07:25:30 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 04:25:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Randolph Chung Message-Id: <3405-Mon07Jun2004072253+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: cagney@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20040607021531.GB601@tausq.org> (message from Randolph Chung on Sun, 6 Jun 2004 19:15:31 -0700) Subject: Re: [patch/commit] function descriptor handling for push_dummy_call Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20040604061024.GQ601@tausq.org> <40C0C30C.7020308@gnu.org> <20040607021531.GB601@tausq.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00113.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 19:15:31 -0700 > From: Randolph Chung > > This is what i finally checked in, as three patches: > - gdbarch change > - hppa-specific change > - documentation change Thanks. > +@var{function} is a pointer to a struct value Please say @code{struct value}. Since these are C identifiers, they should appear in an appropriate typeface in the printed version.