From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1313 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2002 15:30:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1300 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2002 15:30:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freya.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.14) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Aug 2002 15:30:05 -0000 Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by freya.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA) with ESMTP id BRQ48494; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:29:50 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 08:53:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ac131313@ges.redhat.com Message-Id: <3405-Fri23Aug2002183221+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: ac131313@ges.redhat.com, kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3D651E09.8070601@ges.redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:23:21 -0400) Subject: Re: [patch/rfc,RFA:doco] STORE_RETURN_VALUE with regcache Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3D618F65.3000108@ges.redhat.com> <86lm71e6g9.fsf@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3D62A021.9040700@ges.redhat.com> <3D651E09.8070601@ges.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00753.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 13:23:21 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > I've so far not come up with anything better. The attached gets around > the problem by dropping the sanity check -- it is easier to apply. The > lack of a function will be detected (internal-error) but when it is > first called. > > thoughts? The doco patch is okay with me.