From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26077 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2002 10:03:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25992 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2002 10:03:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO odin.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Mar 2002 10:03:33 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (diup-217-189.inter.net.il [213.8.217.189]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id AHD87069; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 12:03:25 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 02:03:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ac131313@cygnus.com Message-Id: <3395-Fri15Mar2002120020+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3C91A2FE.9000300@cygnus.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Fri, 15 Mar 2002 02:30:06 -0500) Subject: Re: [rfa/doc] Branch commit policy Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3C91A2FE.9000300@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00232.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 02:30:06 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > > Attached is the revised branch commit policy. Look ok? Yes, thanks. > +The branch commit policy is pretty slack. @value{GDBN} releases > +@var{5.0}, @var{5.1} and @var{5.2} all used the below: See my comments in the other mail about @var. > +The further a change is from the core of @value{GDBN}, the less likely > +the change will worry anyone (e.g.@: target specific code). See my comments about "e.g." in the other mail. > +@file{MAINTAINERS} file @kbd{;-)} I suggest to use @t{;-)} instead: @kbd is typeset by TeX in slanted font, so the smiley will come out crooked ;-) @t produces an upright typewriter font, which I believe is what you want.