From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5040 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2003 08:42:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4997 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2003 08:42:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2003 08:42:30 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (tony08-235-123.inter.net.il [80.230.235.123] (may be forged)) by aragorn.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.5-GR) with ESMTP id AWG02591; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:42:25 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 08:42:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: drow@mvista.com Message-Id: <3277-Sat14Jun2003114158+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20030614042642.GA28231@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sat, 14 Jun 2003 00:26:42 -0400) Subject: Re: RFA: "disconnect" command Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20030614042642.GA28231@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00493.txt.bz2 > Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 00:26:42 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > Refresher on this one: the patch adds a "disconnect" commad, and > implements it for remote targets. "disconnect" leaves the target > stopped, while "detach" usually resumes it. Useful with kgdb, > gdbserver, et cetera. The patch to gdb.texinfo is approved, but I think we should (a) tell in the docs of `detach' that is usually resumes the target, and (b) have an xref from `disconnect' to `detach'.