From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-14267-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 12955 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2002 08:44:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 12867 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2002 08:44:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO odin.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Apr 2002 08:44:40 -0000
Received: from zaretsky (diup-219-187.inter.net.il [213.8.219.187])
	by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 2.9.3.2)
	with ESMTP id ABA62044;
	Sat, 13 Apr 2002 11:43:36 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 01:44:00 -0000
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: dhoward@redhat.com
Message-Id: <3277-Sat13Apr2002113850+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
CC: fnasser@redhat.com, msnyder@redhat.com, schwab@suse.de,
        Hilfinger@cs.berkeley.edu, drow@mvista.com,
        gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204121247570.25679-100000@theotherone.redhat-remotie.org>
	(message from Don Howard on Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:31:30 -0700 (PDT))
Subject: Re: [RFA] Avoid recursivly defined user functions.
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References:  <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204121247570.25679-100000@theotherone.redhat-remotie.org>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00488.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Don Howard <dhoward@redhat.com>
>  
> +@kindex show max-user-call-depth
> +@kindex set max-user-call-depth
> +@item show max-user-call-depth
> +@item set max-user-call-depth

The second @item should be @itemx.  In general, all the @item's but
the first one should be @itemx when they all pertain to the same entry
in the @table (or in @itemize list).  This is so the produced text
looks like this:

  [previous text]

  show max-user-call-depth
  set max-user-call-depth
      The value of `max-user-call-depth' controls how many...

instead of this:

  [previous text]

  show max-user-call-depth

  set max-user-call-depth
      The value of `max-user-call-depth' controls how many...

where the extra line between the two @item's makes the first one look
as if the following text doesn't apply to it.

> +The value of @code{max-user-call-depth} controls how many levels deep a
> +user-defined call chain can go.

Perhaps this text is a bit more clear:

  The value of @code{max-user-call-depth} controls how many recursion
  levels are allowed in user-defined commands before GDB suspects an
  infinite recursion and aborts the command.