From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17762 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2020 14:48:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17736 invoked by uid 89); 13 Feb 2020 14:48:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=his X-HELO: simark.ca Received: from simark.ca (HELO simark.ca) (158.69.221.121) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:48:45 +0000 Received: from [172.16.0.95] (192-222-181-218.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.181.218]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C5A41E4C2; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 09:48:42 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gdbserver: rename source files to .cc To: Tom Tromey , Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tankut Baris Aktemur References: <20200212225340.28865-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com> <20200212225340.28865-2-simon.marchi@efficios.com> <87zhdmpoov.fsf@tromey.com> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <3229849b-45f7-0863-ba4b-8d650e8b515f@simark.ca> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:48:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87zhdmpoov.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00511.txt.bz2 On 2020-02-13 9:05 a.m., Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi writes: > > Simon> For the same reasons outlined in the previous patch, this patch renames > Simon> gdbserver source files to .cc. > > I support this as well, but I wonder if it would be easier for Tankut if > we held off landing this patch until his big target_ops series goes in. > > Tom > I just tried applying his series over mine with `git am -3` (using git 2.25, if that matters), and it applied just fine. Otherwise, supposing I merge mine, using git-rebase to rebase his branch on master should work fine as well. Simon