From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28853 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2001 06:53:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28713 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2001 06:53:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO odin.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.10) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Dec 2001 06:53:52 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([192.116.55.139]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id ACK33507; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 08:53:44 +0200 (IST) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 10:57:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com Message-Id: <3099-Sat01Dec2001085305+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Jim Blandy on 30 Nov 2001 17:55:04 -0500) Subject: Re: RFA: document GDB's overlay support Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20011130205837.ED4F15E9D8@zwingli.cygnus.com> <8582-Fri30Nov2001235720+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00428.txt.bz2 > From: Jim Blandy > Date: 30 Nov 2001 17:55:04 -0500 > > > This patch is approved, with the following minor comments: > > Great, I'll assume this approval applies (with the comments) to my > text-only patch as well. Yes, it was identical AFAICS (with the exception of the fragment where you import the chart). From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: document GDB's overlay support Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 22:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3099-Sat01Dec2001085305+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <20011130205837.ED4F15E9D8@zwingli.cygnus.com> <8582-Fri30Nov2001235720+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00643.html Message-ID: <20011130225300.RMOmKrRbWKwLZPETDPdDF7a9T3ijpUVUiqwmF0ejEw8@z> > From: Jim Blandy > Date: 30 Nov 2001 17:55:04 -0500 > > > This patch is approved, with the following minor comments: > > Great, I'll assume this approval applies (with the comments) to my > text-only patch as well. Yes, it was identical AFAICS (with the exception of the fragment where you import the chart).