From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 117578 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2019 13:36:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 117569 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jul 2019 13:36:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: mail-wm1-f53.google.com Received: from mail-wm1-f53.google.com (HELO mail-wm1-f53.google.com) (209.85.128.53) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:36:27 +0000 Received: by mail-wm1-f53.google.com with SMTP id s3so5732455wms.2 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 06:36:26 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f913:f700:56ee:75ff:fe8d:232b? ([2001:8a0:f913:f700:56ee:75ff:fe8d:232b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c78sm6288759wmd.16.2019.07.11.06.36.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Jul 2019 06:36:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Make use of gdb::options for info variabels|functions|args|locals To: Andrew Burgess , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <306a840c-719a-0398-26cd-34142ba05167@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 13:36:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-07/txt/msg00298.txt.bz2 On 7/11/19 2:20 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote: > Additional use of the gdb::options framework. > > -- > > Andrew Burgess (2): > gdb: Allow quoting around string options in the gdb::option framework Ahaha, that didn't take long. Thanks for doing this. LGTM. > gdb: Make use of gdb::option framework for some info commands This LGTM to me too, but, I was surprised to find this doesn't add completers at the same time? Thanks, Pedro Alves