From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id +HYnKAJ2GGQzDRUAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 11:04:34 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9F7401E223; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 11:04:34 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=sourceware.org header.i=@sourceware.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=k9jXEdIB; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EBF01E110 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 11:04:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D25385DC3C for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:04:33 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B4D25385DC3C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1679324673; bh=bqeoK0PlVv48WSVFAOEMhA6UObwlAgE6irH8oAiF6AY=; h=To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From:Reply-To:From; b=k9jXEdIB4Sj8gSOteV8ocB9Tu2B8c6XzSgXqKTyWwRLr1ySNVulscXBq8CoSdHdUu HVxVYdWzOn3yJklNhHkTg7E0zGI2lw0LLWVP2JORxEJEV0D8SR3a5e5EqVPKwWGpjs uUUCiT/msioGHdYFceRwP4ziYkiqlr+9OiPCCXWw= Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46CE23858413 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:04:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 46CE23858413 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 32KF3aNQ024576; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:04:11 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3pessyr0k9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:04:11 +0000 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 32KF4AjD027672; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:04:10 GMT Received: from ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (b.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.11]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3pessyr0jy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:04:10 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 32KF3Bks021556; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:04:10 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([9.208.129.117]) by ppma03dal.us.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3pd4x70qqd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:04:10 +0000 Received: from smtpav02.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav02.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [10.39.53.229]) by smtprelay05.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 32KF48DT25756172 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:04:08 GMT Received: from smtpav02.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6494D58068; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:04:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CA15805B; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:04:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-e362e14c-2378-11b2-a85c-87d605f3c641.ibm.com (unknown [9.211.103.7]) by smtpav02.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:04:07 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <301f87afac1250b5a59fa4e39ebdc2f2edf13256.camel@us.ibm.com> To: Tom de Vries , Ulrich Weigand , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , Bruno Larsen , "pedro@palves.net" Cc: cel@us.ibm.com Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:04:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <7a494157-494f-6adf-d533-bf373b0f054f@redhat.com> <71aa635593df0677811afb85409aa190bcfa4f6a.camel@us.ibm.com> <15864a6b87b25c93e99a28149f23138267735f2a.camel@us.ibm.com> <041f62e9f26fd4a536bc90c34f072985582e6237.camel@de.ibm.com> <46c2c756475ba5923d7eed97996632a08285dd42.camel@us.ibm.com> <65861786-069e-53a1-ca17-a525b6629c95@suse.de> <5be0c849abeef84d34a6ff255fb2705ca5dcb035.camel@us.ibm.com> <27caff18b9e133583ba147a21cdd997a0a580828.camel@de.ibm.com> <4195b7b1fe6120e71310a1036841f141b9d1199e.camel@us.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-18.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: o0Mon-tFTYrj4_xOvmiCCZeSRkyh-9zk X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: hzK4GX1e7AGkuaXbyr_QHloVgikbBdfI Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2 ver2] PowerPC: fix for gdb.reverse/finish-precsave.exp and gdb.reverse/finish-reverse.exp X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.942,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-03-20_10,2023-03-20_02,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=447 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2303150002 definitions=main-2303200128 X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Carl Love via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Carl Love Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On Sat, 2023-03-18 at 00:05 +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 3/17/23 18:19, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > Carl Love wrote: > > > > > I have updated gdb/infrun.c per the comments from Ulrich to > > > remove > > > "unnecessary" code and format changes to make the diff as minimal > > > as I > > > can. There are no functional changes in these changes. > > > > > > The patch has been retested on PowerPC to make sure there are no > > > regressions. > > > > > > Please let me know if this version of this patch (second in the > > > series) > > > is acceptable. Thanks. > > > > This version is OK. > > I'm running into these regressions on x86_64-linux: I will take a look to see if I can reproduce the issues. Carl >