From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21595 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2002 19:34:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21517 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2002 19:34:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO factorix.sdv.fr) (194.206.196.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2002 19:34:10 -0000 Received: from ordimaison (ip-76-173.evc.net [212.95.76.173]) by factorix.sdv.fr (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id g18JX6Q23420 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 20:33:07 +0100 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20020208203501.00adf160@ics.u-strasbg.fr> X-Sender: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:34:00 -0000 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com From: muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr Subject: Re: [RFA] win32-nat printf and sprintf removal In-Reply-To: <3C64205B.8030403@cygnus.com> References: <4.2.0.58.20020208182442.00ad05e0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00250.txt.bz2 At 14:00 08/02/02 -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: >> I replaced printf by printf_unfiltered (or printf_filtered >> when there where other printf_filtered in the same function) >> and sprintf by xasprintf in win32-nat.c source. >> >> Does this enter in the obvious fix rules or not? > > >Yes!!!! You also earn huge numbers of brownie points from the Insight >and other GUI developers. Done. Don't forget that I also use GDB integrated in my IDE (for Free Pascal compiler), thus this change is also good for me.