From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19672 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2002 07:55:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19632 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2002 07:55:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO factorix.sdv.fr) (194.206.196.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Jan 2002 07:55:51 -0000 Received: from ordimaison (ip-76-169.evc.net [212.95.76.169]) by factorix.sdv.fr (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id g0V7sck30415; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:54:38 +0100 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20020131085615.0098a100@ics.u-strasbg.fr> X-Sender: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:55:00 -0000 To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com From: muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr Subject: Re: [patch] Mention i386 problem In-Reply-To: <3C589E2E.5040504@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00806.txt.bz2 At 20:30 30/01/02 -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: >FYI, > >I added the attatched. At least it is now documented. (trunk and branch) > >Andrew >2002-01-30 Andrew Cagney > > * PROBLEMS: Note that the i386 fix was missing from 5.1.1. > >Index: PROBLEMS >=================================================================== >RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/PROBLEMS,v >retrieving revision 1.2 >diff -p -r1.2 PROBLEMS >*** PROBLEMS 2001/12/07 23:33:19 1.2 >--- PROBLEMS 2002/01/31 01:27:25 >*************** >*** 1,3 **** >--- 1,17 ---- >+ Known problems in GDB 5.1.1 >+ >+ >+ See also the bug database http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/ >+ >+ >+ Contrary to the GDB 5.1 announcement, the update did not contain fixes Shouldn't it be a 5.1.1 here?