From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-10700-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 32357 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2001 21:53:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 32172 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2001 21:53:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO factorix.sdv.fr) (194.206.196.2)
  by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 22 Nov 2001 21:53:20 -0000
Received: from ordimaison (ip-76-210.evc.net [212.95.76.210])
	by factorix.sdv.fr (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id fAMLLml15003;
	Thu, 22 Nov 2001 22:21:48 +0100
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20011122230240.012afb30@idefix.wisa.be>
X-Sender: pierre@idefix.wisa.be
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 08:34:00 -0000
To: tromey@redhat.com
From: Pierre Muller <pierre@idefix.wisa.be>
Subject: Re: PATCH: --args => build failure
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com>, Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>,
   gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <87n11eec69.fsf@creche.redhat.com>
References: <Pierre Muller's message of "Thu, 22 Nov 2001 12:17:26 +0100">
 <Elena Zannoni's message of "Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:16:14 -0500">
 <873d3mcpcu.fsf@creche.redhat.com>
 <3BED93E7.9000104@cygnus.com>
 <87snbmb9nm.fsf@creche.redhat.com>
 <15356.10158.489653.156184@krustylu.cygnus.com>
 <4.2.0.58.20011122121440.01d54488@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00196.txt.bz2

At 14:19 22/11/01 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr> writes:
>
>Pierre> Your patch does create a build failure for cygwin target.
>
>Sorry about that.  I'll try to fix it this weekend.
>One fix would be to write the correct quoting function for Windows.
>Would you be able to test such a function if I wrote it?

  But that would only fix the problem for one target,
don't you think that my last proposal, to
move the code to infrun.c code is more
general ?

  This does not exclude the fact that a separate version to parse the args
might be needed for cygwin target, but I 
think that the build failure presently concerns all
targets that do not include fork-child.o in NATDEPFILES !