From: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>,
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gdb: make "start" breakpoint inferior-specific
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:29:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c61909c-f5d9-2a69-bbd0-a05a0c39f5f0@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b35c4347-ceb7-7ea2-ee9f-81c71b3f9295@simark.ca>
On 11/11/22 20:03, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches wrote:
>> I'm not sure if this is a better solution: it's more intrusive.
> Ah, that would be good too. We wouldn't have to bake in the knowledge
> of which languages use which operator. But I'm also a bit scared of
> other unintended consequences when looking up the main symbol, as I see
> the current_language is involved in some places. To be safe, I'll just
> go with my naive patch. Thanks for the suggestion.
FWIW, I've just stumbled onto language unknown, and realized that
strictly speaking we've got a regression because we used to have:
...
$ gdb -q -batch a.out -ex "set language unknown" -ex start
Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x40050b: file /home/vries/hello.c, line 6.
Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at /home/vries/hello.c:6
6 printf ("hello\n");
Warning: the current language does not match this frame.
$
...
but now we have:
...
$ gdb -q -batch a.out -ex "set language unknown" -ex start
expression parsing not implemented for language "Unknown"
$
...
I don't really care about this, I thought I just mention it.
Thanks,
- Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-14 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-04 17:40 [PATCH] " Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-08-17 17:56 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-08-31 14:03 ` Bruno Larsen via Gdb-patches
2022-11-04 16:52 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-11-07 8:14 ` Bruno Larsen via Gdb-patches
2022-11-08 17:24 ` Tom Tromey
2022-09-01 10:42 ` Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches
2022-11-04 17:24 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
[not found] ` <8735asb7cj.fsf@redhat.com>
2022-11-09 13:19 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-11-08 19:43 ` Pedro Alves
2022-11-08 20:14 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-11-08 21:09 ` Pedro Alves
2022-11-08 21:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-11-10 16:45 ` Pedro Alves
2022-11-10 17:33 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-11-10 17:36 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-11-10 17:47 ` Pedro Alves
2022-11-10 17:53 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-11-11 12:37 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-11-11 13:53 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-11-11 15:21 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-11-11 19:03 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-11-12 10:43 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-11-14 11:29 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches [this message]
2022-11-14 13:19 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-11-14 14:18 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2022-11-16 16:22 ` Tom Tromey
2022-11-16 16:26 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c61909c-f5d9-2a69-bbd0-a05a0c39f5f0@suse.de \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox