From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 53152 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2018 17:17:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 53126 invoked by uid 89); 30 Apr 2018 17:17:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:17:38 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 410C2F95CC; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.4]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD04B2024CA4; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [RFA v2 2/6] Handle alignof and _Alignof To: Tom Tromey References: <20180427140139.7957-1-tom@tromey.com> <20180427140139.7957-3-tom@tromey.com> <2acfa770-0ec2-b675-a139-f350aa059da0@redhat.com> <87efiw4p1n.fsf@tromey.com> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <2b06093d-1e53-139b-a714-d9a5f19a91af@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:17:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87efiw4p1n.fsf@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00657.txt.bz2 On 04/30/2018 05:49 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: > > Pedro> This looks good to me. A few comments on additional tests below, > Pedro> but there's no need for another round of review for those. > > This patch will need another review since I added some new stuff. Looks good, thanks. Thanks, Pedro Alves