From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25194 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2008 14:51:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 25183 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jan 2008 14:51:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qnxmail.qnx.com (HELO nimbus.ott.qnx.com) (209.226.137.76) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:51:14 +0000 Received: by nimbus.ott.qnx.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:51:11 -0500 Message-ID: <2F6320727174C448A52CEB63D85D11F40AB0@nova.ott.qnx.com> From: Aleksandar Ristovski To: Nick Roberts Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ryan Mansfield Subject: RE: [patch] Fix for varobj.c assertions. Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 14:51:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00351.txt.bz2 > > Aleksandar Ristovski writes: > > > > > > I use: > > > > > > gcc version 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4) > > > Ubuntu 7.04 (2.6.20-15-generic) > > > > > > > What is your gdb version? > > Perhaps I should have said. Current CVS: GNU gdb 6.7.50.20080109-cvs. > > Can anybody else duplicate this problem? (see pr2309) > I did some more testing, it turns out it depends on the toolchain version. Toolchain that produced the problem: gcc 4.1.1 binutils 2.17 However, with gcc 4.1.2 binutils 2.18 the problem does not reproduce. The patch fixes the problem in the case of problematic toolchain version.