From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-16568-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 23366 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2002 18:58:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 23321 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2002 18:58:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO harvester.transas.com) (193.125.200.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Jun 2002 18:58:46 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by harvester.transas.com (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 0FBEB6B821; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:58:31 +0400 (MSD)
Received: from clue.transas.com (clue.transas.com [10.0.0.42])
	by harvester.transas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 05E666B820; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:58:24 +0400 (MSD)
Received: by clue.transas.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <NYHY65PY>; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:58:24 +0400
Message-ID: <2E74F312D6980D459F3A05492BA40F8DFE33B0@clue.transas.com>
From: Andrew Volkov <Andrew.Volkov@transas.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jimb@redhat.com,
	ezannoni@redhat.com
Subject: RE: [RFA/RFC] blockframe.c Fix errorneous addr check 
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:58:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00562.txt.bz2

>
>On Jun 27, 10:08pm, Andrew Volkov wrote:
>
>> Daniel you're right, this bug in coffread.c(complete_symtab) 
>function,
>> rather, in invalid calculating of current_source_end_addr:
>> 
>> 	current_source_end_addr = start_addr + size;
>> 
>> but must be:
>> 
>> 	current_source_end_addr = start_addr + size + <addr sizeof>;
>> 
>> As I understand, since machine address size is not known at 
>time of parsing 
>> coff file, then we have big trouble :(.
>
>Could you explain why you need to add in the size of an address?

It's not necessarily must be addr sizeof, it may be 1, but, I think,
will be better, if current_source_end_addr will contain correct 
value for target.

>
>Assuming it is needed, won't TARGET_PTR_BIT / TARGET_CHAR_BIT 
>provide the
>correct size?
>
>Kevin
>
Sorry, I forget about this macros :)

Andrey