From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-11778-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 2838 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2002 14:03:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2748 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2002 14:03:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO harvester.transas.com) (193.125.200.2)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2002 14:03:08 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by harvester.transas.com (Postfix) with SMTP
	id F38646B833; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:03:06 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from clue.transas.com (clue.transas.com [10.0.0.42])
	by harvester.transas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6EFC16B82E; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:03:06 +0300 (MSK)
Received: by clue.transas.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <CRAGQV1G>; Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:03:06 +0300
Message-ID: <2E74F312D6980D459F3A05492BA40F8D6E738F@clue.transas.com>
From: Andrew Volkov <Andrew.Volkov@transas.com>
To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com>
Cc: =?koi8-r?Q?Gdb-Patches_=28=FC=CC=2E_=D0=CF=DE=D4=C1=29?= <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC/patch 5.1] change NUM_REALREGS to NUM_REGS
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 06:03:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00223.txt.bz2


Elena,

> You should also eliminate the definitions of the NUM_REALREGS macro.
> 

Certainly. I already remove NUM_REALREGS in h8300 part, but since
multiarching 
in progress, I send this changes with first version of multiarching h8300. 

> One definition of that macro is in config/h8300/tm-h8300.h (defined to
> 10). Hmm, h8300-tdep.c defines NUM_REGS to 11, instead. Oh, 
> and look(!)
> config/tm-h8300.h defines NUM_REGS to 13.

Yea, and h8300-simulator using self regnums :).

> 
> You also compile remote-e7000.c when the target triplet is one of
> sh-*-hms, sh-*-coff*, sh-*-elf*, sh-*-linux*. The definition of
> NUM_REALREGS then comes from config/sh/tm-sh.h (in this case is 59).
> 

Therefore I send copy to you personally, as maintaner of SH. Could you
remove 
this obsolete definition from tm-sh.h?


Anrey Volkov