Re: RFC: MI output during program execution

Nick Roberts
2006-03-28T22:18:22Z

> > I never created a branch in the repository but kept merging changes in the
> > repository to my/Apple's changes.
>
> Unfortunately this means no one else can try what you've got...

The reality is no-one will currently want to and it seemed easier to merge
locally. Incidentally if GDB changes version control, I think a distributed
system like Arch would make keeping local branches easier, if thats an
advantage. Now with CVS I have to wade through filenames starting with .#...

> > This worked OK until:
> >
> > 2006-03-24 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
> >
> > * linux-nat.c (linux_ops_saved): New.
> > (super_mourn_inferior, kill_inferior, threaded, linux_nat_ops)
> > (child_mourn_inferior, child_wait, linux_nat_create_inferior)
> > (linux_nat_fetch_registers, linux_nat_store_registers)
> > (linux_nat_child_post_startup_inferior, init_linux_nat_ops): Delete.
> > ...
> >
> > Have you any one liners that might help me understand these changes and
> > what I can do to get GDB to work asynchronously again (at least for
> > Linux).
>
> Well, I have no idea! You didn't say what broke. It replaces the two
> Linux native vectors with one combined vector that works for both.

I was just clutching at straws. I don't know what broke, so I'll have to go
through the changes one by one.

--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob