From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30807 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2002 18:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30730 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2002 18:16:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frigg.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.16) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Nov 2002 18:16:00 -0000 Received: from zaretsky (adsl-ayalon-pc-128-162.inter.net.il [213.8.128.162]) by frigg.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.1-GA) with ESMTP id BYE19653; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:15:48 +0200 (IST) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:16:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ezannoni@redhat.com Message-Id: <2950-Tue12Nov2002201629+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: jjohnstn@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <15824.19936.296672.828391@localhost.redhat.com> (message from Elena Zannoni on Mon, 11 Nov 2002 19:40:00 -0500) Subject: Re: RFA: gdb/783 doc change Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3DD03C0D.7A22A286@redhat.com> <15824.19936.296672.828391@localhost.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00349.txt.bz2 > From: Elena Zannoni > Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 19:40:00 -0500 > > Hmmm, the current documentation specifies that a command is: > > mi-command ==> > [ token ] "-" operation ( " " option )* [ " --" ] ( " " parameter )* nl > > I.e. the -- bit is optional. Doesn't this take already care of the PR? > The PR was filed againt 5.2.1. So the doco was updated in between then > and now. > > Maybe I am misreading the PR, though. You cannot remove '--' from > the data-disasssemble doco because the command really uses it. > The generic doco change seems ok. > > I'll let Eli comment. Andrew already responded to this (and I agree with what he said).