From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31168 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2004 03:55:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31160 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2004 03:55:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 3 Aug 2004 03:55:39 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-199-91.inter.net.il [80.230.199.91]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.6-GR) with ESMTP id EAT24991; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 06:55:23 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 03:55:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-Id: <2914-Tue03Aug2004065313+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: kettenis@chello.nl, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <410EAFBB.5080102@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Mon, 02 Aug 2004 17:18:51 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve i386 prologue analyzer Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200408012158.i71LwpRw033840@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3405-Mon02Aug2004070159+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <410EAFBB.5080102@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 17:18:51 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > Should this be back-ported? Probably, especially if we are going to have GDB 6.2.1. This bug means that anyone who uses GCC 3.3 and later will see bogus backtraces in optimized programs.