Re: [PATCH] Improve i386 prologue analyzer

Andrew Cagney
2004-08-11T17:13:54Z

>>> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:02:04 -0400
>>> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
>>>
>>> However, now that we've got the MIPS patched up, I see no good reason
>>> for holding it back.
>
>
> We are talking about two weeks, not about months or something. Why is
> it worthwhile to go through the pains of another version just so the
> MIPS patch could be released a week or two earlier than if it were to
> be part of the same version as the i386 prologue patch?

Sorry, I don't follow. I would have thought that a little bit of pain
(on our part) would be worth the satisfaction of seeing us deliver a
better working GDB sooner.

Andrew