Re: [PATCH] Improve i386 prologue analyzer

Eli Zaretskii
2004-08-08T19:28:33Z

> Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 06:24:04 -0400
> From: Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>
>
> eliz> If so, could you please explain why you think it needs any more
> eliz> ``marinating'' in HEAD?
>
> It's a new design.

If that's the problem, we could use the less invasive change that I
posted. It just adds a few more cases to a switch, but leaves the
overall structure of the code intact.

> And this feature interacts with many different external variations.
> For example, I haven't seen anyone test it with gcc 2.
> Or with a program that uses a lot of floating point.

As Mark points out, these issues are either already broken or
unaffected.