From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32703 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2004 09:55:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32691 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2004 09:55:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2004 09:55:53 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-209-174.inter.net.il [80.230.209.174]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with ESMTP id BNE47934; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:55:39 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:55:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-Id: <2914-Fri26Mar2004115305+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: carlton@kealia.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <406375ED.1020708@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:14:37 -0500) Subject: Re: GDB 6.1 "frozen" Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <406361B3.5060308@gnu.org> <406375ED.1020708@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00653.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 19:14:37 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > > > > 2004-03-25 David Carlton > > > > * PROBLEMS: Refer to gdb/1588 instead of gdb/826. > > Ok it's "frozen" except for doco changes such as this (and the above, > and another entry I need to fix for frames that I forgot ...). Anyway, Eli? I have no objections to David's suggestion, except that the manual seems to already say that C++ symbols might need quoting in some situations, right? However, if the people who work on C++ support feel that this particular problem needs to be in PROBLEMS, I don't object. > Further to that we need to apply the "proper fix" to PROBLEMS, NEWS, > and README, CONTRIBUTE, and TODO. i.e., get them all integrated into the > doco. Sorry, I'm not sure I understand what needs to be done here.