From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17888 invoked by alias); 3 May 2012 15:04:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 17874 invoked by uid 22791); 3 May 2012 15:04:56 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 May 2012 15:04:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB8B29000B; Thu, 3 May 2012 17:04:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D7T+YPNCL7yo; Thu, 3 May 2012 17:04:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAC3290007; Thu, 3 May 2012 17:04:28 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [RFA] Emit a warning for ineffective set VAR = EXP command Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tristan Gingold In-Reply-To: <20120503150229.GH15555@adacore.com> Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 15:04:00 -0000 Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org ml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <28BE5DE6-872B-4CA1-87CF-BB260BE68B09@adacore.com> References: <8781499A-A489-42D0-80B1-75136331DBDB@adacore.com> <87mx5x40uz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <05ADE46C-9093-4EE4-92A7-1232779DE5DC@adacore.com> <98CB5870-6AB6-40FA-B3A1-9AF8269B2909@adacore.com> <20120503150229.GH15555@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 On May 3, 2012, at 5:02 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Ah thanks. I didn't start from the best .exp file. >=20 > The ration of bad-old-cruft vs up-to-date is very bad, so I try to > avoid starting from random .exp files (I usually start from a few > of mine that are recent and were reviewed by others). >=20 > Here is a link to our Testcase Cookbook: > http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDBTestcaseCookbook I wasn't aware of this page. Maybe it should be the default home gdb page = :-)