From: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
To: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [gdb/tdep] Fix gdb.base/watchpoint-running on {arm, ppc64le}-linux
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 10:08:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27e9c8fb-8c91-489f-b2d2-c971647379ca@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9939e750-5ab9-4703-be6b-ff544d4d09d1@suse.de>
On 6/13/24 10:07, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 6/7/24 14:05, Tom de Vries wrote:
>> On 6/7/24 12:18, Luis Machado wrote:
>>> On 6/7/24 07:35, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>>> When running test-case gdb.base/watchpoint-running on ppc64le-linux, we get:
>>>> ...
>>>> (gdb) watch global_var^M
>>>> warning: Error when detecting the debug register interface. \
>>>> Debug registers will be unavailable.^M
>>>> Watchpoint 2: global_var^M
>>>> (gdb) FAIL: $exp: all-stop: hardware: watch global_var
>>>> FAIL: $exp: all-stop: hardware: watchpoint hit (timeout)
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> The problem is that ppc_linux_dreg_interface::detect fails to detect the
>>>> hardware watchpoint interface, because the calls to ptrace return with errno
>>>> set to ESRCH.
>>>>
>>>> This is a feature of ptrace: if a call is done while the tracee is not
>>>> ptrace-stopped, it returns ESRCH.
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, in the test-case "watch global_var" is executed while the inferior is
>>>> running, and that triggers the first call to ppc_linux_dreg_interface::detect.
>>>>
>>>> And because the detection failure is cached, subsequent attempts at setting
>>>> hardware watchpoints will also fail, even if the tracee is ptrace-stopped.
>>>>
>>>> Fix this by calling target_can_use_hardware_watchpoint from
>>>> linux_init_ptrace_procfs, which is called from both:
>>>> - linux_nat_target::post_attach, and
>>>> - linux_nat_target::post_startup_inferior.
>>>>
>>>> By fixing this here, we also fix the same problem for arm-linux.
>>>>
>>>> Tested on ppc64le-linux and arm-linux.
>>>>
>>>> PR tdep/31834
>>>> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31834
>>>> PR tdep/31705
>>>> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31705
>>>> ---
>>>> gdb/linux-nat.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/gdb/linux-nat.c b/gdb/linux-nat.c
>>>> index c95d420d416..d8b5a99269b 100644
>>>> --- a/gdb/linux-nat.c
>>>> +++ b/gdb/linux-nat.c
>>>> @@ -454,6 +454,18 @@ linux_init_ptrace_procfs (pid_t pid, int attached)
>>>> linux_ptrace_init_warnings ();
>>>> linux_proc_init_warnings ();
>>>> proc_mem_file_is_writable ();
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Some targets (for instance ppc and arm) may call ptrace to answer a
>>>> + target_can_use_hardware_watchpoint query, and cache the result. However,
>>>> + the ptrace call will fail with errno ESRCH if the tracee is not
>>>> + ptrace-stopped, making the query fail. And if the caching mechanism does
>>>> + not disregard an ESRCH result, all subsequent queries will also fail.
>>>> + Call it now, where we known the tracee is ptrace-stopped.
>>>> +
>>>> + Other targets (for instance aarch64) do the relevant ptrace call and
>>>> + caching in their implementation of post_attach and post_startup_inferior,
>>>> + in which case this call is expected to have no effect. */
>>>> + target_can_use_hardware_watchpoint (bp_hardware_watchpoint, 1, 0);
>>>> }
>>>> linux_nat_target::~linux_nat_target ()
>>>>
>>>> base-commit: f9478936896ada7786e8d68622f6e6ff78b97b0d
>>>
>>> Looks good from arm-linux's side. Thanks!
>>>
>>> Reviewed-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
>>> Tested-By: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
>>
>> Luis, thanks for the review and the testing.
>>
>> Pedro, since you reviewed a target-specific patch for the arm PR, any comments?
>
> And just to mention this, I'd like to backport this fix to the gdb-15-branch.
>
> Thanks,
> - Tom
>
That's OK by me from arm's side.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-13 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-07 6:35 Tom de Vries
2024-06-07 10:18 ` Luis Machado
2024-06-07 12:05 ` Tom de Vries
2024-06-13 9:07 ` Tom de Vries
2024-06-13 9:08 ` Luis Machado [this message]
2024-06-14 16:49 ` Pedro Alves
2024-06-17 18:22 ` Tom de Vries
2024-06-20 13:49 ` Tom de Vries
2024-06-20 18:15 ` Pedro Alves
2024-06-21 9:43 ` Tom de Vries
2024-06-21 12:44 ` Pedro Alves
2024-06-21 14:51 ` Tom de Vries
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27e9c8fb-8c91-489f-b2d2-c971647379ca@arm.com \
--to=luis.machado@arm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox