From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1829E385703A for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 02:03:35 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 1829E385703A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93C591E009; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 22:03:34 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] breakpoint.c: Fix advance/until and multiple locations To: =?UTF-8?B?57SA6YeN56aV?= , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <27c4a444-3b72-3b00-ec23-5e6e9082d5e7@simark.ca> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 22:03:34 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, BODY_8BITS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 02:03:36 -0000 On 2020-08-26 11:06 a.m., 紀重禕 wrote: > Fix bug 26524 , > iterate the sals variable to insert a breakpoint for each > > -- > Best regards, > Chung-Yi Chi > Hi, I'm not sure the approach is right, since you end up creating multiple until_break_fsm objects (one for each sal) and overwriting them. Pedro Alves posted some patches fixing the same problem here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-August/171427.html which look good to me. Could you please take a look at those? Simon