From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6721 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2004 17:32:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6710 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2004 17:32:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aragorn.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.23) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2004 17:32:13 -0000 Received: from zaretski (pns03-209-174.inter.net.il [80.230.209.174]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with ESMTP id CQJ04837; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 19:32:01 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 17:32:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: David Carlton Message-Id: <2719-Fri26Mar2004192925+0300-eliz@gnu.org> CC: cagney@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from David Carlton on Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:00:42 -0800) Subject: Re: GDB 6.1 "frozen" Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <406361B3.5060308@gnu.org> <406375ED.1020708@gnu.org> <2914-Fri26Mar2004115305+0300-eliz@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00668.txt.bz2 > From: David Carlton > Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:00:42 -0800 > > > I have no objections to David's suggestion, except that the manual > > seems to already say that C++ symbols might need quoting in some > > situations, right? > > I didn't see that when I just skimmed the manual, but I might have > missed it. See the node "Completion" (and "i quotes RET" in Info would land you there for free ;-). However, I see that I misremembered: that part of the manual deals with problems in completion, not with C++ symbols in general. > I have mixed feelings about Michael's desire of mentioning everything > that could be called a regression, no matter how small, in PROBLEMS. Me too. Do you feel that this specific issue is not important enough to be in PROBLEMS?