Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update auxv cache when inferior pid is 0 (no inferior)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 09:30:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26831717-834d-91ee-fb08-55f787bd2421@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220805154656.47903-1-luis.machado@arm.com>



On 2022-08-05 11:46, Luis Machado via Gdb-patches wrote:
> While adding support for MTE corefiles and running the MTE corefile tests,
> I noticed a strange situation where loading the symbol file + core file
> through the command line has a different behavior compared to firing up
> GDB, loading the symbol file with the "file" command and then loading the
> core file with the "core" command.
> 
> I tracked this down to gdb/auxv.c:get_auxv_inferior_data returning empty
> auxv data for pid 0, which gets cached. This is triggered by attempting to
> read auxv data for the exec target.
> 
> In the early stages of reading the core file, we're still using inferior pid
> 0, so when we attempt to read auxv to determine corefile features, we get the
> cached empty data vector again. This breaks core_gdbarch setup.
> 
> The fix, suggested by John Baldwin, prevents caching auxv data for pid 0.

I read the thread where you discussed this with John, I'm not sure I
completely grasp the problem yet, but this doesn't feel like the right
fix.  It should be fine to cache the auxv data for an inferior with pid
0.  If the inferior's memory and the inferior's target stack don't
change between two invocations of get_auxv_inferior_data, there's no
reason for the auxv data to be different for both calls.  I think the
problem is more that we don't invalidate the data at the right time.

The first call is done when only the exec target is pushed.  The second
call is done when the core target is pushed on top of that.  It's
expected that the returned auxv data can be different for the two calls,
so the cache should be invalidated somewhere between them.

Simon

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-12 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-19 14:45 [PATCH] Update auxv cache when there is no auxv cached data Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-07-25  9:42 ` [PING][PATCH] " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-07-25 16:05 ` [PATCH] " John Baldwin
2022-07-25 18:03   ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-07-25 19:13     ` John Baldwin
2022-08-02 15:05       ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-08-02 16:05         ` John Baldwin
2022-08-05 15:46 ` [PATCH] Update auxv cache when inferior pid is 0 (no inferior) Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-08-11  9:05   ` [PING][PATCH] " Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-08-18 15:48   ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-09-01  9:29   ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-09-07  8:20   ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-09-12 12:48   ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-09-12 13:30   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches [this message]
2022-09-12 13:53     ` [PATCH] " John Baldwin
2022-09-12 13:59       ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-09-20 12:28 ` [PATCH] Invalidate auxv cache before creating a core target Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-09-20 17:49   ` John Baldwin
2022-10-07 20:44   ` [PATCH] gdb: fix auxv caching Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-10-07 21:43     ` John Baldwin
2022-10-09  0:39       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-10-10 18:32         ` John Baldwin
2022-10-11 17:52           ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-10-11 20:31         ` Pedro Alves
2022-10-11 20:34           ` Pedro Alves
2022-10-11 20:42             ` John Baldwin
2022-10-12  1:11               ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2022-10-10  9:33     ` Luis Machado via Gdb-patches
2022-10-11 17:53       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26831717-834d-91ee-fb08-55f787bd2421@simark.ca \
    --to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
    --cc=simark@simark.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox