From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26065 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2007 10:32:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 26056 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Feb 2007 10:32:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ics.u-strasbg.fr (HELO ics.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.112.250) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:32:01 +0000 Received: from www-ics.u-strasbg.fr (websd.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.112.253]) by ics.u-strasbg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3881C187023; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 11:34:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from 130.79.112.72 (SquirrelMail authenticated user muller) by www-ics.u-strasbg.fr with HTTP; Fri, 2 Feb 2007 11:29:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <2674.130.79.112.72.1170412166.squirrel@www-ics.u-strasbg.fr> Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 10:32:00 -0000 Subject: Re: Testsuite failures in gdb.dwarf2/{dup-psym,mac-fileno}.exp From: "Pierre Muller" To: "Andreas Schwab" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-To: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit References: In-Reply-To: Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 On Wed, January 31, 2007 17:43, Andreas Schwab said: > There are two other testcases with invalid DWARF sections. Checked in as > obvious. I was just wandering if this would also be correct on a chip that a 64bit memory addresses. Does dwarf not support these cpus? Pierre Muller