From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22321 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2009 16:54:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 22308 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jul 2009 16:54:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from web112520.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (HELO web112520.mail.gq1.yahoo.com) (98.137.26.118) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:54:26 +0000 Received: (qmail 98716 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Jul 2009 16:54:24 -0000 Message-ID: <266448.98713.qm@web112520.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Received: from [123.237.139.128] by web112520.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:54:23 PDT Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:00:00 -0000 From: paawan oza Subject: Re: final i386.floating.record.patch To: Michael Snyder Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" In-Reply-To: <4A70EA5C.3090702@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00745.txt.bz2 Hi, please find my answers below. 1) Are you using a Windows machine to send your emails? If so, is it possible that there is a Unix/Linux machine you could try sending from? Your attachments look OK for me, but some people seem to have had problems with them. Oza : I used to send all from windows till now. but this patch I sent it from Linux...from opera. =20 2) And are you using cut-and-paste to insert the patches into the body of your email? That would certainly cause problems, because tabs might be changed into spaces (which is exactly what was causing patch to fail for me today). =20 Oza: yes I am using copy-paste....I dont know any-other way. because attachmenet are not welcome, so I am not sure how I could proceed w= ith this. I will send you updated patch.....may be I might have mistaken of old gdb f= ile. sorry for incovenience. Regards, Oza. =20 >=20 --- On Thu, 7/30/09, Michael Snyder wrote: > From: Michael Snyder > Subject: Re: final i386.floating.record.patch > To: "paawan oza" > Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" > Date: Thursday, July 30, 2009, 6:03 AM > Michael Snyder wrote: > > paawan oza wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Now the format is modified, and I am submitting > the patch, I hope this meets the expectations. > >> thank you all for your review comments specially > Micahel and Hui. > >> please find the patch as follows. > >=20 > > I'm sorry, Oza, but the patch does not apply. > >=20 > > bash-3.00$ patch < > ~/oza3/i386.floating.record.patch.txt > > patching file i386-tdep.c > > Hunk #3 succeeded at 4249 with fuzz 1. > > Hunk #4 FAILED at 4263. > > Hunk #5 FAILED at 4321. > > Hunk #6 FAILED at 4330. > > Hunk #7 FAILED at 4351. > > Hunk #8 FAILED at 4362. > > Hunk #9 FAILED at 4414. > > Hunk #10 FAILED at 4451. > > Hunk #11 FAILED at 4470. > > Hunk #12 FAILED at 4489. > > Hunk #13 FAILED at 5110. > > 10 out of 13 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > i386-tdep.c.rej >=20 > Just thinking about it -- this was the first time that I > had > trouble applying one of your patches.=A0 But I > remembered that > previously, I always applied your patch from the > attachment. > This time there was no attachment, so I saved the email > message > and edited out the email headers. >=20 > I know you've had a lot of trouble with attachments and > patches > not applying -- I'd like to get it sorted out if possible. >=20 1) Are you using a Windows machine to send your emails?=A0 If so, is it possible that there is a Unix/Linux machine you could try sending from?=A0 Your attachments look OK for me, but some people seem to have had problems with them. =20 2) And are you using cut-and-paste to insert the patches into the body of your email?=A0 That would certainly cause problems, because tabs might be changed into spaces (which is exactly what was causing patch to fail for me today). =20 =20 >=20