Re: [rfc] PR 20569, segv in follow_exec

Luis Machado
2016-10-21T18:34:55Z

On 10/21/2016 01:33 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 10/21/2016 07:30 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
>
>> How does the test (and patch) look now?
>
> Did the code change compared to Sandra's version? You mentioned
> some issue previously. It'd be great for review if
> the git log / rationale were re-included/updated.

I'll send a fresh v2 with all the bits.