Re: [rfc] PR 20569, segv in follow_exec

Pedro Alves
2016-10-21T18:33:07Z

On 10/21/2016 07:30 PM, Luis Machado wrote:

> How does the test (and patch) look now?

Did the code change compared to Sandra's version? You mentioned
some issue previously. It'd be great for review if
the git log / rationale were re-included/updated.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves