From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17034 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2003 03:50:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17027 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2003 03:50:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frigg.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.16) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2003 03:50:41 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.234.142]) by frigg.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.2-GA) with ESMTP id CGG29549; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 05:50:28 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 03:50:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ac131313@redhat.com Message-Id: <2593-Thu27Mar2003054359+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3E822DE5.2050207@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:47:01 -0500) Subject: Re: [rfa:doco] inline gdbmi.texinfo and annotate.texinfo in gdb.texinfo Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3E80CEE7.6090609@redhat.com> <7458-Wed26Mar2003061550+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <3E822DE5.2050207@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00537.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:47:01 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > > > > I don't mind, but what's the reasons for merging gdbmi.texinfo? > > A simple `I might as well integrate both at the same time'. The > separate gdbmi.texinfo file is a throw-back to before MI was contributed. Fine with me, then.