From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17603 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2002 09:31:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17581 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2002 09:31:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freya.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.14) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Aug 2002 09:31:19 -0000 Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by freya.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA) with ESMTP id BRS80987; Sat, 24 Aug 2002 12:31:09 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 02:31:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: ac131313@ges.redhat.com Message-Id: <2593-Sat24Aug2002123336+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3D66B84F.6010803@ges.redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:33:51 -0400) Subject: Re: [rfc/rfa:doco] Use @sc{gdb}? Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <3D66B84F.6010803@ges.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00792.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:33:51 -0400 > From: Andrew Cagney > > I got annoyed at all the GDB's in the formatted manual being really > large so tried changing them to @sc{gdb}. It fixed that problem but I'm > not sure that I like the final result :-) (You'll need to build > gdb.pdf, gdb ps or gdb.dvi). > > Is there a style guide thing on this one? Eli? There are no strict rules on this one, AFAIK. If the results of @sc{gdb} look nice to people, let's do it; if not, let's not. Personally, I like the results of @sc in such cases.