From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
To: muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, djbarrow@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC 2] Remove hardware break and watchpoints at program exit.
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 04:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2561-Fri11Jan2002143543+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.20020111125745.0135ea48@ics.u-strasbg.fr> (message from Pierre Muller on Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:00:44 +0100)
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:00:44 +0100
> From: Pierre Muller <muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
>
> In breakpoint_init_inferior
> I added code that conditionally removes hardware watch and breakpoint
> if the context is inf_exited, i.e. at exit of the debugged program.
Thanks. I like this approach much better, especially because I never
understood why does GDB do certain cleanups when the debuggee exits,
but doesn't do other, similar cleanups.
> I still kept the call to a generic hardware removal function
> and testing the i386 case, I could see that even though the dr_mirror
> array is zeored out, the dr_control_mirror and
> dr_status_mirror still aren't set to zero.
> For dr_control_register, this is due to an error in the I386_DR_DISABLE
> because that macro only resets the active bit, but not the size and type bits
> associated to that debug register.
Why is this a problem? Once the active bit is off, the corresponding
debug register is inactive, and its value is not important.
> * breakpoint.c (REMOVE_HARDWARE_BREAKPOINT_AT_EXIT):
> Define to 0 if not defined.
> (REMOVE_HARDWARE_WATCHPOINT_AT_EXIT):
> Define to 0 if not defined.
Why do we need these macros at all? Why not remove the breakpoints
and watchpoints unconditionally? Does anyone see any problem?
> --- go32-nat.c 2001/12/06 08:15:37 1.26
> +++ go32-nat.c 2002/01/11 11:34:08
> @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ go32_mourn_inferior (void)
> be nice if GDB itself would take care to remove all breakpoints
> at all times, but it doesn't, probably under an assumption that
> the OS cleans up when the debuggee exits. */
> - i386_cleanup_dregs ();
> + // i386_cleanup_dregs ();
Please don't make such changes. If you want to remove some code, just
remove it, don't comment it away: it looks ad-hoc and not clean.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-11 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-11 4:01 Pierre Muller
2002-01-11 4:38 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2002-01-11 4:57 ` Pierre Muller
2002-01-11 5:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-01-11 5:39 ` Pierre Muller
2002-01-11 6:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-01-11 8:15 ` Pierre Muller
2002-01-11 9:20 ` [RFA/RFC 3] " Pierre Muller
2002-01-12 5:20 ` Mark Kettenis
2002-01-12 13:16 ` muller
2002-01-13 0:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2561-Fri11Jan2002143543+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--to=eliz@is.elta.co.il \
--cc=djbarrow@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox