From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1291 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2010 08:56:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 1281 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jan 2010 08:56:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO mel.act-europe.fr) (212.99.106.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:55:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D3ECB021A; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:55:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from mel.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ebP3rePNQhO7; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:55:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from ulanbator.act-europe.fr (ulanbator.act-europe.fr [10.10.1.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mel.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CADCB016C; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:55:54 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix has_section_at_zero for separate debug files Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tristan Gingold In-Reply-To: <20100111220043.44a9449d@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:56:00 -0000 Cc: tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tristan Gingold Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <254FF340-5F5B-4A69-9466-8DD7A9E633C1@adacore.com> References: <20100107130918.GA11037@chinon.act-europe.fr> <20100111220043.44a9449d@redhat.com> To: Kevin Buettner X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00295.txt.bz2 On Jan 12, 2010, at 6:00 AM, Kevin Buettner wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:28:48 -0700 > Tom Tromey wrote: > >> Tristan> No regression on GNU Linux i386. >> >> I wonder whether this code path is tested there. >> I don't know. > > I don't know either. My earlier patch (which seems to be causing > problems on Darwin now) was motivated by some problems that I was > seeing with mep-elf. > > I'll test Tristan's patch using a mep-elf build in the next few days > to see if it too solves the problems that I was seeing last year. Thanks for doing that. Tristan.