From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-84017-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21095 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2011 16:16:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 21084 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Oct 2011 16:16:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.59.227)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:16:18 +0000
Received: from omta18.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.90])	by qmta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast	id gDly1h0051wpRvQ5CGGJQ0; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:16:18 +0000
Received: from [10.127.238.91] ([65.206.2.68])	by omta18.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast	id gGG51h01h1U2a2h3eGG7Tx; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:16:16 +0000
Subject: Re: Python: fetch value when building gdb.Value object [rediff]
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Paul Koning <paulkoning@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <m3y5x2gyym.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:16:00 -0000
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <25071E96-2ACB-4ED0-83CE-BE3B7187BB31@comcast.net>
References: <36B29E9D-F2B3-446F-AF8A-97254A3AAEE2@comcast.net> <m3ipocii6a.fsf@redhat.com> <20111001092852.GB11227@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20111001121642.GA29550@host1.jankratochvil.net> <m3y5x2gyym.fsf@redhat.com>
To: pmuldoon@redhat.com
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00020.txt.bz2


On Oct 3, 2011, at 6:18 AM, Phil Muldoon wrote:

> Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
>=20
>> Updated for current HEAD:
>>=20
>> On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:28:52 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:24:45 +0200, Phil Muldoon wrote:
>>> What scenario will this test catch that the previous test won't?  I'm
>>> not saying you are incorrect, I just don't understand. What
>>> error-trigger does the assignment to "inval" trigger?
>>=20
>> I would prefer here a testcase more clearly showing the bug, attached be=
low.
>>=20
>> I believe the patch is right, as Phil hasn't yet agreed posting it only.
>=20
> It looks great, thanks for doing this.

Thanks all.

Committed.

	paul