From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id aOtUBzA3TGhnlQwAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 10:35:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1749825328; bh=nUlq32CDx+YsIls13RatSz+qOrl14l4KguPdKApeH3Y=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=Kz43DWOejVmnaySOe/VT104j4GGFKmcRspojIyvWhZfR2yjAsrcTk2SzXAq8naSc5 /pXVK67NfDjL005gGk7mdlmU3+IYgc1eUj2ciOzEb0ScQK38DliItLPsOYI28UWqzj yeR5nsCa7xv1Z//rulF+K5shqulneNdfU6sm4st8= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0731E1E102; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 10:35:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=isfvErbM; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=WuHwr0Hz; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59B621E089 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 10:35:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82CF394959D for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:35:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B82CF394959D Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=isfvErbM; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=WuHwr0Hz Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73175393A8F2 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 14:34:28 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 73175393A8F2 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 73175393A8F2 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.221.121 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1749825268; cv=none; b=kwYPpxxdtCXNjnz9nAep1xy2Y6cF2IZVBxiiRUGqVE/iJubqlxTllMrpF8EHht4OgskR9BknvrzR6Jy11CeQqXPFyiJqGt2hckDwrlTYWhHyAWzqncxqqer62tbNFufDCoT+hvHRIcGanvA65Z+jT6gvHdgKnSkUUrjJKCmtHo0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1749825268; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nUlq32CDx+YsIls13RatSz+qOrl14l4KguPdKApeH3Y=; h=DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Subject:To:From; b=W0rasUKOgshfTycy6Qvalho+iKsFkrukPwPU8HEqr45wviY9q+G8HohAGBPmCL/4HFyJVoSYv0xqZLrxhm3aJatiJsnIPuPNXc+XnD2vm6swGbUPn5DljV7U4rF0NGHmpWs1BuvOyQx0o65bPy1BCaXHXpvV4KBxMCETrJQlI1s= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 73175393A8F2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1749825267; bh=nUlq32CDx+YsIls13RatSz+qOrl14l4KguPdKApeH3Y=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=isfvErbMUD6p+PJUDcwtq4LRsY0DzzdaDF8Ji1Jz+s/ZcsZK+UQuGfwOAUhYKyBUs dkkTWEdQ0QLBHvBwpFLEs71QgY1KgLdLfa7177YkqJlZ+02QVYUDyA4PYaiHqcnJjr /FBqLfo9I18aWO7ioWKhSEsURaWM1MdZmhZSM5uk= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id F337C1E11F; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 10:34:27 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1749825266; bh=nUlq32CDx+YsIls13RatSz+qOrl14l4KguPdKApeH3Y=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=WuHwr0HzQ8C66EhVAMSRYUzYzRYyLo+zFBeymaf7jng32KaeO+sUkodgGiaBanMJf v3XgGC/+kl8IwBWmOL6rd9ajdsUutkVPl718sPMaAyrTyWF9TV7DnKVvrniS2qpMj0 m8Mi64TImqI3eAwY2d4PT6yFcnsfQ8VGrscoPPX4= Received: from [172.16.0.192] (192-222-132-26.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.132.26]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4719C1E089; Fri, 13 Jun 2025 10:34:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <24364e14-34f9-4fa5-b916-0cb8465b4d75@simark.ca> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 10:34:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gdb/alpha: Add target description support To: Yodel Eldar Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20250526151219.399450-1-yodel.eldar@gmail.com> <20250526151219.399450-2-yodel.eldar@gmail.com> <55cdf445-fee8-4e70-99c0-6d42eb68cd7d@simark.ca> <9feb7348-1dde-40cc-b21d-97671b8b3e39@gmail.com> <3ef4c598-28d8-4c66-844d-58e5629415ab@gmail.com> <40cede5f-1b8c-4eb9-b702-3805499efbf5@gmail.com> <869aca3b-78ab-4ec6-af23-56394c040d75@simark.ca> <23b2a4ce-b818-47aa-bae0-d97183196880@gmail.com> Content-Language: fr From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: <23b2a4ce-b818-47aa-bae0-d97183196880@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 6/12/25 6:07 PM, Yodel Eldar wrote: > > On 6/12/25 3:33 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: >> >> On 2025-06-12 16:30, Simon Marchi wrote: >>> Thanks for the detailed investigation. I'm not super familiar with >>> register descriptions and the register numbering. I think it's better >>> to be on the safe side and leave it there, it shouldn't bother anybody. >>> >>> From my non-Alpha-expert point of view, the series LGTM, so I'm tempted >>> to approve it. Maciej, did you have some comments on the code? Does it >>> look good to you? >> However, do you have a copyright assignment on file with the FSF? This >> is required in order to contribute any non-trivial code. If not, please >> see: >> >> https://gitweb.git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=blob;f=doc/Copyright/request-assign.future;hb=HEAD >> >> Simon > > > Thanks for the swift response! > > I don't have an assignment on file, but I just submitted the request > form and await their response. Thanks, let us know when it's done. Simon