From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11983 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2004 15:34:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 11896 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2004 15:34:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2004 15:34:15 -0000 Received: from zaretski ([80.230.144.65]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with ESMTP id BMR16936; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 17:33:28 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:34:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: Andrew Cagney Message-Id: <2427-Sat20Mar2004173049+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <405B1CE3.2070007@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:16:35 -0500) Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Add meaningful section titles to PROBLEMS Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <405B1CE3.2070007@gnu.org> X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00481.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:16:35 -0500 > From: Andrew Cagney > > This patch gets rid of the meaningless(1) "Regressions since X.X" titles > replacing them with functional section titles: > > *** C++ support > > *** Stack backtraces > > *** Misc > > (I think that's all) The file is re-ordered but none of the contents > change. > > comments? Fine with me. > In terms of content, I think any "problem" that is there for more than > one full release cycle should be documented Why not document them when we cut the release branch, if we decide that this particular problem is not going to be fixed in that release? Why wait for another release?